crazeasfen.blogg.se

Dokuwiki vs mediawiki
Dokuwiki vs mediawiki











  1. Dokuwiki vs mediawiki install#
  2. Dokuwiki vs mediawiki software#
  3. Dokuwiki vs mediawiki download#

However, those namespaces make up part of each page’s URL, so if you do a lot of deep-level nesting, URLs can become rather long. Remember, each namespace is just a directory, so it can other directories which can, in turn, contain other directories. You can nest categories in MediWiki, and you can nest categories in DokuWiki, as well. However, you can have multiple pages with the same name, as long as each one is in a different namespace. Because of this, a DokuWiki page can only belong to a single category. 2) Because DokuWiki stores its data in files, each namespace is literally a directory on your server that pages go into.

dokuwiki vs mediawiki

(MediaWiki has namespaces, too, but they are not fun. 1ĭokuWiki does much the same thing with namespaces. Because of this, you can add a page to multiple categories, but categorizing pages is much less intentional. MediaWiki allows you to add pages to categories by adding a category tag to each page.

Dokuwiki vs mediawiki download#

If you’re not okay with the command line, you can download and upload via FTP. Again, if you’re handy with the command line, tarball your files, navigate to your new server, wget the tarball, and unpack it. The other consequence is that it’s fairly easy to move a DokuWiki install.

dokuwiki vs mediawiki

If you’re not handy with the command line, you can just download your entire DokuWiki site via FTP.

Dokuwiki vs mediawiki install#

If you are handy with the command line, you can simply compress your entire install into a tarball and then copy the tarball to a secure location. The first is that it is an easy matter to back up a DokuWiki site. There are a couple of other consequences to DokuWiki’s flat-file nature. This means that DokuWiki can be incredibly fast and and responsive. It’s just that those files are cached in a database, rather than being served directly. In fact, if you’re using a database-driven CMS and server-based caching, visitors to your site are already getting their data from files. This doesn’t make DokuWiki any less robust. Instead, it stores all its data in files. The biggest difference between MediaWiki and DokuWiki is that MediaWiki requires a database while DokuWiki doesn’t. If you’ve overlooked DokuWiki in the past because it’s not MediaWiki, or are looking for a wiki engine that is lightweight and has a lot of options, I urge you to give DokuWiki serious consideration. I’m going to examine some of the key differences between the two. Still, for a lot of purposes, MediaWiki may be overkill.

Dokuwiki vs mediawiki software#

It is, after all, the software behind WikiPedia.

dokuwiki vs mediawiki

MediaWiki also scales well, so whether you’ve got ten users or tens of thousands of users, it can handle it. MediaWiki is powerful and robust and has a lot of features out of the box that DokuWiki lacks. I’ve never really worked much with DokuWiki because I’ve tended to use MediaWiki for most wiki projects. I’ve been working with DokuWiki a lot lately, because I’m adapting it to use for internal communications and project management at work. I realize that the vast majority of spammers won’t see this message, but rest assured, your spam won’t get through. Notice!For reasons I don’t quite understand, this post seems to attract more than its fair share of comment spam.













Dokuwiki vs mediawiki